[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20211124161221.2224005-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 17:12:18 +0100
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Carsten Emde <C.Emde@...dl.org>,
John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>, Daniel Wagner <wagi@...om.org>,
Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...nel.org>,
"Srivatsa S . Bhat" <srivatsa@...il.mit.edu>,
Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
bigeasy@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH RT 09/10] drm/i915/gt: Queue and wait for the irq_work item.
On 2021-11-23 10:37:55 [-0500], Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Is there something else missing here, as this gives the following rejects in
> irq_work.c:
Yeah, there is this irq-work in v5.10-RT and this slightly different
thing that managed upstream while upstream managed to alter their code,
too :)
Please find attached as a reply to this email the backported patches:
[PATCH RT 1/3] irq_work: Allow irq_work_sync() to sleep if irq_work() no
[PATCH RT 2/3] irq_work: Handle some irq_work in a per-CPU thread on
[PATCH RT 3/3] irq_work: Also rcuwait for !IRQ_WORK_HARD_IRQ on
which apply here on top of v5.10.78-rt55.
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists