lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <163777541640.2712255.13531254221451180690.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 24 Nov 2021 17:36:56 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>,
        Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>
Cc:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-power@...rohmeurope.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: rohm-generic: remove unused dummies

On Wed, 24 Nov 2021 07:57:49 +0200, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> Function rohm_regulator_set_voltage_sel_restricted() and
> rohm_regulator_set_dvs_levels() had inlined dummy implementations for
> cases when the real implementation was not configured in.
> 
> All of the drivers who issue the call to these functions do SELECT the
> real implementation from the Kconfig. There should be no cases where the
> real implementation was not selected by the drivers using these
> functions - such a situation is likely to be an error which deserves to be
> noticed at compile-time.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] regulator: rohm-generic: remove unused dummies
      commit: 432dd1fc134ef902b049b26839edfd3fdc1f8dc0

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ