[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211124180328.307061241@goodmis.org>
Date:   Wed, 24 Nov 2021 13:03:15 -0500
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Carsten Emde <C.Emde@...dl.org>,
        Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
        John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>, Daniel Wagner <wagi@...om.org>,
        Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...nel.org>,
        "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa@...il.mit.edu>,
        "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: [PATCH RT 12/13] irq_work: Also rcuwait for !IRQ_WORK_HARD_IRQ on PREEMPT_RT
5.10.78-rt56-rc3 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
On PREEMPT_RT most items are processed as LAZY via softirq context.
Avoid to spin-wait for them because irq_work_sync() could have higher
priority and not allow the irq-work to be completed.
Wait additionally for !IRQ_WORK_HARD_IRQ irq_work items on PREEMPT_RT.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211006111852.1514359-5-bigeasy@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
---
 include/linux/irq_work.h | 5 +++++
 kernel/irq_work.c        | 6 ++++--
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/irq_work.h b/include/linux/irq_work.h
index f551ba9c99d4..2c0059340871 100644
--- a/include/linux/irq_work.h
+++ b/include/linux/irq_work.h
@@ -55,6 +55,11 @@ static inline bool irq_work_is_busy(struct irq_work *work)
 	return atomic_read(&work->flags) & IRQ_WORK_BUSY;
 }
 
+static inline bool irq_work_is_hard(struct irq_work *work)
+{
+	return atomic_read(&work->flags) & IRQ_WORK_HARD_IRQ;
+}
+
 bool irq_work_queue(struct irq_work *work);
 bool irq_work_queue_on(struct irq_work *work, int cpu);
 
diff --git a/kernel/irq_work.c b/kernel/irq_work.c
index 03d09d779ee1..cbec10c32ead 100644
--- a/kernel/irq_work.c
+++ b/kernel/irq_work.c
@@ -211,7 +211,8 @@ void irq_work_single(void *arg)
 	flags &= ~IRQ_WORK_PENDING;
 	(void)atomic_cmpxchg(&work->flags, flags, flags & ~IRQ_WORK_BUSY);
 
-	if (!arch_irq_work_has_interrupt())
+	if ((IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT) && !irq_work_is_hard(work)) ||
+	    !arch_irq_work_has_interrupt())
 		rcuwait_wake_up(&work->irqwait);
 }
 
@@ -271,7 +272,8 @@ void irq_work_sync(struct irq_work *work)
 	lockdep_assert_irqs_enabled();
 	might_sleep();
 
-	if (!arch_irq_work_has_interrupt()) {
+	if ((IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT) && !irq_work_is_hard(work)) ||
+	    !arch_irq_work_has_interrupt()) {
 		rcuwait_wait_event(&work->irqwait, !irq_work_is_busy(work),
 				   TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
 		return;
-- 
2.33.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
