[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87czmpcto5.wl-maz@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 18:09:14 +0000
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To: Tyler Baicar <baicar@...amperecomputing.com>
Cc: patches@...erecomputing.com, abdulhamid@...amperecomputing.com,
darren@...amperecomputing.com, catalin.marinas@....com,
will@...nel.org, james.morse@....com, alexandru.elisei@....com,
suzuki.poulose@....com, lorenzo.pieralisi@....com,
guohanjun@...wei.com, sudeep.holla@....com, rafael@...nel.org,
lenb@...nel.org, tony.luck@...el.com, bp@...en8.de,
mark.rutland@....com, anshuman.khandual@....com,
vincenzo.frascino@....com, tabba@...gle.com, marcan@...can.st,
keescook@...omium.org, jthierry@...hat.com, masahiroy@...nel.org,
samitolvanen@...gle.com, john.garry@...wei.com,
daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, gor@...ux.ibm.com,
zhangshaokun@...ilicon.com, tmricht@...ux.ibm.com,
dchinner@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, ishii.shuuichir@...itsu.com,
Vineeth.Pillai@...rosoft.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ACPI/AEST: Initial AEST driver
On Wed, 24 Nov 2021 17:07:07 +0000,
Tyler Baicar <baicar@...amperecomputing.com> wrote:
>
> Add support for parsing the ARM Error Source Table and basic handling of
> errors reported through both memory mapped and system register interfaces.
>
> Assume system register interfaces are only registered with private
> peripheral interrupts (PPIs); otherwise there is no guarantee the
> core handling the error is the core which took the error and has the
> syndrome info in its system registers.
>
> Add logging for all detected errors and trigger a kernel panic if there is
> any uncorrected error present.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tyler Baicar <baicar@...amperecomputing.com>
> ---
> MAINTAINERS | 1 +
> arch/arm64/include/asm/ras.h | 52 ++++
> arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h | 2 +
> arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile | 1 +
> arch/arm64/kernel/ras.c | 125 +++++++++
> arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 2 +
> drivers/acpi/arm64/Kconfig | 3 +
> drivers/acpi/arm64/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/acpi/arm64/aest.c | 450 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/acpi_aest.h | 50 ++++
> include/linux/cpuhotplug.h | 1 +
> 11 files changed, 688 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/ras.h
> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/kernel/ras.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/acpi/arm64/aest.c
> create mode 100644 include/linux/acpi_aest.h
>
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index 5250298d2817..aa0483726606 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -382,6 +382,7 @@ ACPI FOR ARM64 (ACPI/arm64)
> M: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
> M: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>
> M: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
> +R: Tyler Baicar <baicar@...amperecomputing.com>
> L: linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
> L: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org (moderated for non-subscribers)
> S: Maintained
Isn't this a bit premature? This isn't even mentioned in the commit
message, only in passing in the cover letter.
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
> index 16b3f1a1d468..6bbed061d835 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
> @@ -230,6 +230,8 @@
> #define SYS_ERXADDR_EL1 sys_reg(3, 0, 5, 4, 3)
> #define SYS_ERXMISC0_EL1 sys_reg(3, 0, 5, 5, 0)
> #define SYS_ERXMISC1_EL1 sys_reg(3, 0, 5, 5, 1)
> +#define SYS_ERXMISC2_EL1 sys_reg(3, 0, 5, 5, 2)
> +#define SYS_ERXMISC3_EL1 sys_reg(3, 0, 5, 5, 3)
> #define SYS_TFSR_EL1 sys_reg(3, 0, 5, 6, 0)
> #define SYS_TFSRE0_EL1 sys_reg(3, 0, 5, 6, 1)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> index e3ec1a44f94d..dc15e9896db4 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> @@ -1573,6 +1573,8 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = {
> { SYS_DESC(SYS_ERXADDR_EL1), trap_raz_wi },
> { SYS_DESC(SYS_ERXMISC0_EL1), trap_raz_wi },
> { SYS_DESC(SYS_ERXMISC1_EL1), trap_raz_wi },
> + { SYS_DESC(SYS_ERXMISC2_EL1), trap_raz_wi },
> + { SYS_DESC(SYS_ERXMISC3_EL1), trap_raz_wi },
>
This looks like a fix that would deserve its own patch.
Thanks,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists