[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a3pQW59NVF=5P+ZiBjNJmnWh+iTZUHvqHBrXkHA6pMd4g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 08:49:05 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>
Cc: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-sh list <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
André Almeida <andrealmeid@...labora.com>
Subject: Re: spinlock.c:306:9: error: implicit declaration of function '__raw_write_lock_nested'
On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 8:31 AM Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net> wrote:
> On 11/23/21 5:38 AM, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
>
> diff --git a/arch/sh/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl
> b/arch/sh/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl
> index 208f131659c5..65c3a94bff48 100644
> --- a/arch/sh/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl
> +++ b/arch/sh/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl
> @@ -437,7 +437,7 @@
> 432 common fsmount sys_fsmount
> 433 common fspick sys_fspick
> 434 common pidfd_open sys_pidfd_open
> -# 435 reserved for clone3
> +435 common clone3 sys_clone3
> 436 common close_range sys_close_range
> 437 common openat2 sys_openat2
> 438 common pidfd_getfd sys_pidfd_getfd
Did you test clone3? This needs a custom wrapper on most architectures
to have sensible calling conventions. If sh doesn't need it, that should
be explained in the changelog text.
> @@ -451,3 +451,4 @@
> 446 common landlock_restrict_self sys_landlock_restrict_self
> # 447 reserved for memfd_secret
> 448 common process_mrelease sys_process_mrelease
> +449 common futex_waitv sys_futex_waitv
I don't know what's going on with this one, I don't actually see
a reason why it isn't already wired up on all architectures. If we add
this, it should probably be done for all architectures at once as a
bugfix, but it's possible that this is intentionally only used on
x86 and arm.
André, can you comment on this?
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists