[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211124193037.nu7q4pa3sianzqtc@treble>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 11:30:37 -0800
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, joao@...rdrivepizza.com, hjl.tools@...il.com,
andrew.cooper3@...rix.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ndesaulniers@...gle.com, keescook@...omium.org,
samitolvanen@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 6/6] objtool: Add IBT validation / fixups
On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 06:03:07PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> +static int validate_ibt_reloc(struct objtool_file *file, struct reloc *reloc, char **name)
> +{
> + struct instruction *dest;
> + struct section *sec;
> + unsigned long off;
> +
> + sec = reloc->sym->sec;
> + off = reloc->sym->offset + reloc->addend;
> +
> + dest = find_insn(file, sec, off);
> + if (!dest)
> + return 0;
> +
> + if (name && dest->func)
> + *name = dest->func->name;
I think these checks can be further narrowed down by only looking for
X86_64_64 relocs.
> + list_for_each_entry(insn, &file->endbr_list, call_node) {
> + if (ibt_seal) {
> + elf_write_insn(file->elf, insn->sec,
> + insn->offset, insn->len,
> + arch_nop_insn(insn->len));
> + }
Like the retpoline rewriting, I'd much rather have objtool create
annotations which the kernel can then read and patch itself.
e.g. have '.ibt.direct_call_sites' and '.ibt.unused_endbr_insns'
sections.
--
Josh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists