linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] tracing/uprobe: Fix uprobe_perf

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YZ6bLc81ZBeRUG+U@krava>
Date:   Wed, 24 Nov 2021 21:06:05 +0100
From:   Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] tracing/uprobe: Fix uprobe_perf_open probes iteration

On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 10:30:24AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 10:27 AM Linus Torvalds
> <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > Instead, you should do something like
> >
> >         list_for_each_entry(pu, trace_probe_probe_list(tp), tp.list) {
> 
> That 'pu' is a typo, it should be 'tu'.
> 
> The patch itself got it right, I think.
> 
> HOWEVER. Despite the patch itself getting it right, I want to point
> out that that was mostly by luck than anything else.
> 
> The patch is ENTIRELY UNTESTED.

I put your patch to the test and.. it passed ;-)

there are several other places like this around and also in trace_kprobe.c
I can send the follow up fix tomorrow

thanks,
jirka

> 
> Because that's how I roll, as you should all know by now.
> 
>                   Linus
>