[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YZ30La8Z7oZEoXFF@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 09:13:33 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Lizhi Hou <lizhi.hou@...inx.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
jacmet@...site.dk
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] tty: serial: uartlite: allow 64 bit address
On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 12:12:06PM -0800, Lizhi Hou wrote:
>
> On 11/23/21 10:59 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 10:45:06AM -0800, Lizhi Hou wrote:
> > > Fix the uartlite probe failure when it is mapped to address above 4G.
> > Fix it how?
>
> Does this detail comment look ok to you?
>
> The base address of uartlite registers could be 64 bit address which is from
> device resource. When ulite_probe() calls ulite_assign(), this 64 bit
> address is casted to 32-bit. The fix is to replace "u32" type with
> "phys_addr_t" type for the base address in ulite_assign() argument list.
Much better.
> >
> > > Signed-off-by: Lizhi Hou <lizhi.hou@...inx.com>
> > What commit caused this problem? What commit does this fix? Should it
> > go to stable kernels?
>
> I searched the history. This problem was introduced by https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/8fa7b6100693e0b648ffd34564f6f41226502a19
>
> And yes, I agree this should go to stable kernels. I will add
> stable@...r.kernel.org to cc list.
Thank you, please add a Fixes: tag to the patch as well when you
resubmit it.
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists