lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YZ6wg9A5p5WUy7+k@cmpxchg.org>
Date:   Wed, 24 Nov 2021 16:37:07 -0500
From:   Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
To:     Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
Cc:     akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mhocko@...e.com, mcgrof@...nel.org,
        keescook@...omium.org, yzaikin@...gle.com,
        dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, vbabka@...e.cz,
        mgorman@...hsingularity.net, corbet@....net, yi.zhang@...wei.com,
        xi.fengfei@....com, rppt@...nel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] sysctl: change watermark_scale_factor max limit to
 30%

On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 11:36:04AM -0800, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> For embedded systems with low total memory, having to run applications
> with relatively large memory requirements, 10% max limitation for
> watermark_scale_factor poses an issue of triggering direct reclaim
> every time such application is started. This results in slow application
> startup times and bad end-user experience.
> By increasing watermark_scale_factor max limit we allow vendors more
> flexibility to choose the right level of kswapd aggressiveness for
> their device and workload requirements.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>

Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>

No objection from me as this limit was always totally arbitrary. But I
have to say I'm a bit surprised: The current maximum setting will wake
kswapd when free memory drops below 10% and have it reclaim until
20%. This seems like quite a lot? Are there applications that really
want kswapd to wake at 30% and target 60% of memory free?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ