[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20211124135014.665649a0bcb872367b248cef@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 13:50:14 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@...il.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
<kasan-dev@...glegroups.com>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Yongqiang Liu <liuyongqiang13@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mm: Defer kmemleak object creation of module_alloc()
On Wed, 24 Nov 2021 22:20:34 +0800 Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com> wrote:
> Yongqiang reports a kmemleak panic when module insmod/rmmod
> with KASAN enabled(without KASAN_VMALLOC) on x86[1].
>
> When the module area allocates memory, it's kmemleak_object
> is created successfully, but the KASAN shadow memory of module
> allocation is not ready, so when kmemleak scan the module's
> pointer, it will panic due to no shadow memory with KASAN check.
>
> module_alloc
> __vmalloc_node_range
> kmemleak_vmalloc
> kmemleak_scan
> update_checksum
> kasan_module_alloc
> kmemleak_ignore
>
> Note, there is no problem if KASAN_VMALLOC enabled, the modules
> area entire shadow memory is preallocated. Thus, the bug only
> exits on ARCH which supports dynamic allocation of module area
> per module load, for now, only x86/arm64/s390 are involved.
>
> Add a VM_DEFER_KMEMLEAK flags, defer vmalloc'ed object register
> of kmemleak in module_alloc() to fix this issue.
>
I guess this is worth backporting into -stable kernels? If so, what
would be a suitable Fixes: target? I suspect it goes back to the
initial KASAN merge date?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists