[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20211124093002.9795-1-ajithpv.linux@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 15:00:02 +0530
From: Ajith P V <ajithpv.linux@...il.com>
To: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, arve@...roid.com, tkjos@...roid.com,
maco@...roid.com, joel@...lfernandes.org, christian@...uner.io,
hridya@...gle.com, surenb@...gle.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ajith P V <ajithpv.linux@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] binder: reframe comment to avoid warning
binder.c file comment produce warning with checkpatch as below:
WARNING: waitqueue_active without comment
Placing the waitqueue_active comment just above waitqueue_active() avoid
this warning.
Signed-off-by: Ajith P V <ajithpv.linux@...il.com>
---
drivers/android/binder.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/android/binder.c b/drivers/android/binder.c
index 49fb74196d02..e1695535f252 100644
--- a/drivers/android/binder.c
+++ b/drivers/android/binder.c
@@ -4424,10 +4424,12 @@ static int binder_thread_release(struct binder_proc *proc,
/*
* If this thread used poll, make sure we remove the waitqueue
* from any epoll data structures holding it with POLLFREE.
- * waitqueue_active() is safe to use here because we're holding
- * the inner lock.
*/
if ((thread->looper & BINDER_LOOPER_STATE_POLL) &&
+ /*
+ * waitqueue_active() is safe to use here because we're holding
+ * the inner lock.
+ */
waitqueue_active(&thread->wait)) {
wake_up_poll(&thread->wait, EPOLLHUP | POLLFREE);
}
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists