[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211124195449.33f31e7f@mail.inbox.lv>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 19:54:49 +0900
From: Alexey Avramov <hakavlad@...ox.lv>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mhocko@...e.com,
vbabka@...e.cz, neilb@...e.de, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
corbet@....net, riel@...riel.com, hannes@...xchg.org,
david@...morbit.com, willy@...radead.org, hdanton@...a.com,
penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp, oleksandr@...alenko.name,
kernel@...mod.org, michael@...haellarabel.com, aros@....com,
hakavlad@...il.com
Subject: Re: mm: 5.16 regression: reclaim_throttle leads to stall in
near-OOM conditions
> it does eventually get killed OOM
However, a full minute freeze can be a great evil in many situations -
during such a freeze, the system is completely unresponsive.
So my next question is: How reasonable is the value MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES?
Is it also get "out of thin air"?
And would it make sense to have buttons to adjust the timeouts?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists