[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87wnkypccp.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 12:32:38 +1100
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
Cc: Michael Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>, Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: update_balloon_size_func blocked for more than 120 seconds
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com> writes:
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 11:49 PM Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org> wrote:
>>
>> I get the following splats with a kvm guest in idle, after a few seconds
>> it starts:
>>
>> [ 242.412806] INFO: task kworker/6:2:271 blockedfor more than 120 seconds.
>> [ 242.415790] Tainted: G E 5.15.0-next-20211111 #68
>> [ 242.417755] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
>> [ 242.418332] task:kworker/6:2 state:D stack: 0 pid: 271 ppid: 2 flags:0x00004000
>> [ 242.418954] Workqueue: events_freezable update_balloon_size_func [virtio_balloon]
>> [ 242.419518] Call Trace:
>> [ 242.419709] <TASK>
>> [ 242.419873] __schedule+0x2fd/0x990
>> [ 242.420142] schedule+0x4e/0xc0
>> [ 242.420382] tell_host+0xaa/0xf0 [virtio_balloon]
>> [ 242.420757] ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
>> [ 242.421065] update_balloon_size_func+0x2c9/0x2e0 [virtio_balloon]
>> [ 242.421527] process_one_work+0x1e5/0x3c0
>> [ 242.421833] worker_thread+0x50/0x3b0
>> [ 242.422204] ? rescuer_thread+0x370/0x370
>> [ 242.422507] kthread+0x169/0x190
>> [ 242.422754] ? set_kthread_struct+0x40/0x40
>> [ 242.423073] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
>> [ 242.423347] </TASK>
>>
>> And this goes on endlessly. The last one says it blocked for more than 1208
>> seconds. This was not happening until the last few weeks but I see no
>> relevant recent commits for virtio_balloon, so the related change could
>> be elsewhere.
>
> We're stuck somewhere in:
>
> wq: update_balloon_size_func()->fill_balloon()->tell_host()
>
> Most probably in wait_event().
>
>
> I am no waitqueue expert, but my best guess would be that we're
> waiting more than 2 minutes
> on a host reply with TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE. At least that's my interpretation,
>
> In case we're really stuck for more than 2 minutes, the hypervisor
> might not be processing our
> requests anymore -- or it's not getting processed for some other reason (or the
> waitqueue is not getting woken up due do some other BUG).
>
> IIUC, we can sleep longer via wait_event_interruptible(), TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE
> seems to be the issue that triggers the warning. But by changing that
> might just be hiding the fact that
> we're waiting more than 2 minutes on a reply.
>
>>
>> I could bisect but first I figured I'd check to see if someone already
>> had spotted this.
>
> Bisecting would be awesome, then we might at least know if this is a
> guest or a hypervisor issue.
I see this on ppc64le also.
I bisected it to:
# first bad commit: [939779f5152d161b34f612af29e7dc1ac4472fcf] virtio_ring: validate used buffer length
I also reported it in the thread hanging off that patch:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/87zgpupcga.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au/
cheers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists