[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8735nmquti.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 11:08:25 +1100
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: LEROY Christophe <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/signal32: Use struct_group() to zero spe regs
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> writes:
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 04:43:36PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> LEROY Christophe <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu> writes:
>> > Le 18/11/2021 à 21:36, Kees Cook a écrit :
>> >> In preparation for FORTIFY_SOURCE performing compile-time and run-time
>> >> field bounds checking for memset(), avoid intentionally writing across
>> >> neighboring fields.
>> >>
>> >> Add a struct_group() for the spe registers so that memset() can correctly reason
>> >> about the size:
>> >>
>> >> In function 'fortify_memset_chk',
>> >> inlined from 'restore_user_regs.part.0' at arch/powerpc/kernel/signal_32.c:539:3:
>> >> >> include/linux/fortify-string.h:195:4: error: call to '__write_overflow_field' declared with attribute warning: detected write beyond size of field (1st parameter); maybe use struct_group()? [-Werror=attribute-warning]
>> >> 195 | __write_overflow_field();
>> >> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> >>
>> >> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
>> >
>> > Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
>>
>> Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
>
> Thanks! Should I take this via my tree, or do you want to take it via
> ppc?
I don't mind. If it's easier for you to take it as part of an existing
series then do that, otherwise I can pick it up.
cheers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists