linux-kernel - [PATCH 5/5] staging: r8188eu: remove TxCount from getTxPowerIndex88E()

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 25 Nov 2021 20:59:36 +0100
From:   Michael Straube <straube.linux@...il.com>
To:     gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc:     Larry.Finger@...inger.net, phil@...lpotter.co.uk,
        linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Michael Straube <straube.linux@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5/5] staging: r8188eu: remove TxCount from getTxPowerIndex88E()

In getTxPowerIndex88E() the variable TxCount is set to RF_PATH_A and
never changed. Remove the unnecessary extra variable and replace its
usage with RF_PATH_A.

Signed-off-by: Michael Straube <straube.linux@...il.com>
---
 drivers/staging/r8188eu/hal/rtl8188e_phycfg.c | 13 ++++++-------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/hal/rtl8188e_phycfg.c b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/hal/rtl8188e_phycfg.c
index 7124b9880efa..73d5eb53a927 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/hal/rtl8188e_phycfg.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/hal/rtl8188e_phycfg.c
@@ -611,18 +611,17 @@ static void getTxPowerIndex88E(struct adapter *Adapter, u8 channel, u8 *cckPower
 {
 	struct hal_data_8188e *pHalData = GET_HAL_DATA(Adapter);
 	u8 index = (channel - 1);
-	u8 TxCount = RF_PATH_A;
 
 	/*  1. CCK */
-	cckPowerLevel[TxCount] = pHalData->Index24G_CCK_Base[TxCount][index];
+	cckPowerLevel[RF_PATH_A] = pHalData->Index24G_CCK_Base[RF_PATH_A][index];
 	/* 2. OFDM */
-	ofdmPowerLevel[TxCount] = pHalData->Index24G_BW40_Base[RF_PATH_A][index] +
-		pHalData->OFDM_24G_Diff[TxCount][RF_PATH_A];
+	ofdmPowerLevel[RF_PATH_A] = pHalData->Index24G_BW40_Base[RF_PATH_A][index] +
+		pHalData->OFDM_24G_Diff[RF_PATH_A][RF_PATH_A];
 	/*  1. BW20 */
-	BW20PowerLevel[TxCount] = pHalData->Index24G_BW40_Base[RF_PATH_A][index] +
-		pHalData->BW20_24G_Diff[TxCount][RF_PATH_A];
+	BW20PowerLevel[RF_PATH_A] = pHalData->Index24G_BW40_Base[RF_PATH_A][index] +
+		pHalData->BW20_24G_Diff[RF_PATH_A][RF_PATH_A];
 	/* 2. BW40 */
-	BW40PowerLevel[TxCount] = pHalData->Index24G_BW40_Base[TxCount][index];
+	BW40PowerLevel[RF_PATH_A] = pHalData->Index24G_BW40_Base[RF_PATH_A][index];
 }
 
 static void phy_PowerIndexCheck88E(struct adapter *Adapter, u8 channel, u8 *cckPowerLevel,
-- 
2.33.1