[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <F52F65FE-6A07-486B-8E84-684ED85709E9@holtmann.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 21:02:01 +0100
From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com>,
Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@...il.com>,
linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Bluetooth: virtio_bt: fix device removal
Hi Michael,
> Device removal is clearly out of virtio spec: it attempts to remove
> unused buffers from a VQ before invoking device reset. To fix, make
> open/close NOPs and do all cleanup/setup in probe/remove.
so the virtbt_{open,close} as NOP is not really what a driver is suppose
to be doing. These are transport enable/disable callbacks from the BT
Core towards the driver. It maps to a device being enabled/disabled by
something like bluetoothd for example. So if disabled, I expect that no
resources/queues are in use.
Maybe I misunderstand the virtio spec in that regard, but I would like
to keep this fundamental concept of a Bluetooth driver. It does work
with all other transports like USB, SDIO, UART etc.
> The cost here is a single skb wasted on an unused bt device - which
> seems modest.
There should be no buffer used if the device is powered off. We also don’t
have any USB URBs in-flight if the transport is not active.
> NB: with this fix in place driver still suffers from a race condition if
> an interrupt triggers while device is being reset. Work on a fix for
> that issue is in progress.
In the virtbt_close() callback we should deactivate all interrupts.
Regards
Marcel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists