linux-kernel - [PATCH v1 06/10] misc: at25: Switch to use BIT() instead of custom approaches

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20211125213203.86693-7-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 25 Nov 2021 23:31:59 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Jiri Prchal <jiri.prchal@...ignal.cz>
Subject: [PATCH v1 06/10] misc: at25: Switch to use BIT() instead of custom approaches

It's obvious that custom approach of getting power of 2 number with
int_pow() kinda interesting. Replace it and some others approaches
by using a simple BIT() operation.

Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/misc/eeprom/at25.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/misc/eeprom/at25.c b/drivers/misc/eeprom/at25.c
index 70cab386040a..c9660a4625ce 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/eeprom/at25.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/eeprom/at25.c
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
  * Copyright (C) 2006 David Brownell
  */
 
+#include <linux/bits.h>
 #include <linux/kernel.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/slab.h>
@@ -17,7 +18,6 @@
 #include <linux/spi/spi.h>
 #include <linux/spi/eeprom.h>
 #include <linux/property.h>
-#include <linux/math.h>
 
 /*
  * NOTE: this is an *EEPROM* driver.  The vagaries of product naming
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ static int at25_ee_read(void *priv, unsigned int offset,
 
 	instr = AT25_READ;
 	if (at25->chip.flags & EE_INSTR_BIT3_IS_ADDR)
-		if (offset >= (1U << (at25->addrlen * 8)))
+		if (offset >= BIT(at25->addrlen * 8))
 			instr |= AT25_INSTR_BIT3;
 	*cp++ = instr;
 
@@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ static int at25_ee_write(void *priv, unsigned int off, void *val, size_t count)
 
 		instr = AT25_WRITE;
 		if (at25->chip.flags & EE_INSTR_BIT3_IS_ADDR)
-			if (offset >= (1U << (at25->addrlen * 8)))
+			if (offset >= BIT(at25->addrlen * 8))
 				instr |= AT25_INSTR_BIT3;
 		*cp++ = instr;
 
@@ -437,7 +437,7 @@ static int at25_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
 			return -ENODEV;
 		}
 
-		at25->chip.byte_len = int_pow(2, id[7] - 0x21 + 4) * 1024;
+		at25->chip.byte_len = BIT(id[7] - 0x21 + 4) * 1024;
 		if (at25->chip.byte_len > 64 * 1024)
 			at25->chip.flags |= EE_ADDR3;
 		else
-- 
2.33.0