[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YZ7otljGYQ/4UP99@google.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 01:36:54 +0000
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] KVM: x86: ignore APICv if LAPIC is not enabled
On Mon, Nov 22, 2021, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Synchronize the condition for the two calls to kvm_x86_sync_pir_to_irr.
> The one in the reenter-guest fast path invoked the callback
> unconditionally even if LAPIC is disabled.
>
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index 5a403d92833f..441f4769173e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -9849,7 +9849,7 @@ static int vcpu_enter_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> if (likely(exit_fastpath != EXIT_FASTPATH_REENTER_GUEST))
> break;
>
> - if (vcpu->arch.apicv_active)
> + if (kvm_lapic_enabled(vcpu) && vcpu->arch.apicv_active)
Ooooh, lapic _enabled_, not just present. That took me far too long to read...
Reviewed-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
> static_call(kvm_x86_sync_pir_to_irr)(vcpu);
>
> if (unlikely(kvm_vcpu_exit_request(vcpu))) {
> --
> 2.27.0
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists