linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] can: do not increase rx

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMZ6RqJWdO3tvOz020Ee_zcFnJDFWO9qxM7Rtjw2+n_o79B+cw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 26 Nov 2021 08:28:56 +0900
From:   Vincent MAILHOL <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr>
To:     Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>
Cc:     Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>, linux-can@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev,
        Jimmy Assarsson <extja@...ser.com>,
        Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com>,
        Chandrasekar Ramakrishnan <rcsekar@...sung.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
        Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
        Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
        Yasushi SHOJI <yashi@...cecubics.com>,
        Appana Durga Kedareswara rao <appana.durga.rao@...inx.com>,
        Naga Sureshkumar Relli <naga.sureshkumar.relli@...inx.com>,
        Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
        Stephane Grosjean <s.grosjean@...k-system.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] can: do not increase rx_bytes statistics for RTR frames

Hi Oliver,

On. 26 Nov. 2021 at 03:50, Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net> wrote:
> Hi Vincent,
>
> On 25.11.21 18:20, Vincent Mailhol wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/can/usb/ucan.c b/drivers/net/can/usb/ucan.c
> > index d582c39fc8d0..717d4925fdb0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/can/usb/ucan.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/can/usb/ucan.c
> > @@ -619,12 +619,13 @@ static void ucan_rx_can_msg(struct ucan_priv *up, struct ucan_message_in *m)
> >       /* copy the payload of non RTR frames */
> >       if (!(cf->can_id & CAN_RTR_FLAG) || (cf->can_id & CAN_ERR_FLAG))
> >               memcpy(cf->data, m->msg.can_msg.data, cf->len);
> > +     /* only frames which are neither RTR nor ERR have a payload */
> > +     else
> > +             stats->rx_bytes += cf->len;
>
> This 'else' path looks wrong ...

Ack. I will send a v3.
And thanks a lot for the review!

> >
> >       /* don't count error frames as real packets */
> > -     if (!(cf->can_id & CAN_ERR_FLAG)) {
> > +     if (!(cf->can_id & CAN_ERR_FLAG))
> >               stats->rx_packets++;
> > -             stats->rx_bytes += cf->len;
> > -     }
> >
> >       /* pass it to Linux */
> >       netif_rx(skb);
>
> Regards,
> Oliver