[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <15a001964945969dd7fc2422f0ab1eecfa299211.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 21:49:19 -0500
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg@...cle.com>, keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, dhowells@...hat.com,
dwmw2@...radead.org, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
davem@...emloft.net, jarkko@...nel.org, jmorris@...ei.org,
serge@...lyn.com
Cc: keescook@...omium.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
weiyongjun1@...wei.com, nayna@...ux.ibm.com, ebiggers@...gle.com,
ardb@...nel.org, nramas@...ux.microsoft.com, lszubowi@...hat.com,
jason@...c4.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com, pjones@...hat.com,
konrad.wilk@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 03/17] integrity: Introduce a Linux keyring called
machine
Hi Eric,
On Tue, 2021-11-23 at 23:41 -0500, Eric Snowberg wrote:
> +config INTEGRITY_MACHINE_KEYRING
> + bool "Provide a keyring to which CA Machine Owner Keys may be added"
> + depends on SECONDARY_TRUSTED_KEYRING
> + depends on INTEGRITY_ASYMMETRIC_KEYS
Shouldn't this be "ASYMMETRIC_PUBLIC_KEY_SUBTYPE=y"? With this
change, is "KEYS: Create static version of
public_key_verify_signature" trusted needed?
Mimi
> + depends on SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_KEYRING
> + depends on LOAD_UEFI_KEYS
> + help
> + If set, provide a keyring to which CA Machine Owner Keys (MOK) may
> + be added. This keyring shall contain just CA MOK keys. Unlike keys
> + in the platform keyring, keys contained in the .machine keyring will
> + be trusted within the kernel.
> +
Powered by blists - more mailing lists