linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] KEXEC_SIG with appended signature

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 25 Nov 2021 10:14:12 +0100
From:   Philipp Rudo <prudo@...hat.com>
To:     Michal Suchánek <msuchanek@...e.de>
Cc:     Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>, Nayna <nayna@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        keyrings@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@...ux.microsoft.com>,
        Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
        Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        Hari Bathini <hbathini@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        Frank van der Linden <fllinden@...zon.com>,
        Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Daniel Axtens <dja@...ens.net>, buendgen@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] KEXEC_SIG with appended signature

Hi Michal,

On Wed, 24 Nov 2021 14:27:16 +0100
Michal Suchánek <msuchanek@...e.de> wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 08:10:10AM -0500, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> > On Wed, 2021-11-24 at 12:09 +0100, Philipp Rudo wrote:  
> > > Now Michal wants to adapt KEXEC_SIG for ppc too so distros can rely on all
> > > architectures using the same mechanism and thus reduce maintenance cost.
> > > On the way there he even makes some absolutely reasonable improvements
> > > for everybody.
> > > 
> > > Why is that so controversial? What is the real problem that should be
> > > discussed here?  
> > 
> > Nothing is controversial with what Michal wants to do.  I've already
> > said, "As for adding KEXEC_SIG appended signature support on PowerPC
> > based on the s390 code, it sounds reasonable."  
> 
> Ok, I will resend the series with the arch-specific changes first to be
> independent of the core cleanup.

could you please add the kexec@...ts.infradead.org to Cc when you
resend the series. As this is kexec related I think it makes sense to
give them a heads up, too.

Thanks
Philipp