lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 25 Nov 2021 13:40:21 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     lianzhi chang <changlianzhi@...ontech.com>
Cc:     "dmitry.torokhov" <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        jirislaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>, 282827961 <282827961@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14] tty: Fix the keyboard led light display problem

On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 10:33:23AM +0800, lianzhi chang wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 08, 2021 at 01:51:39PM +0800, lianzhi chang wrote:
> > > > Switching from the desktop environment to the tty environment,
> > > > the state of the keyboard led lights and the state of the keyboard
> > > > lock are inconsistent. This is because the attribute kb->kbdmode
> > > > of the tty bound in the desktop environment (Xorg) is set to
> > > > VC_OFF, which causes the ledstate and kb->ledflagstate
> 
> > > We know that Xorg sets kbdmode mode to VC_OFF, but it does not mean that
> > > you can say for sure that it is Xorg instance that controls a VT simply
> > > by observing kb->kbdmode. There may be something else entirely. That is
> > > why you want drivers/tty/vt/keyboard.c to reset LEDs and leave it to
> > > whoever is controlling VT to set them to something else if it is
> > > desired.
> 
> > Does this mean let me change the description information? Or is the
> > judgment of VC_OFF in patch incorrect?
> > The setup method of Xorg mentioned here is just to describe a process
> > in which I found the problem;
> > My understanding is that when the mode of kbdmode is set to VC_OFF,
> > VT shouldn't interfere with the state of the keyboard light, right? This is
> > how functions such as kbd_keycode() are implemented.
> > When VT is switched, if the VT mode is VC_OFF, there is also no need
> > to set the state of the keyboard light. I think this is reasonable.
> 
> > > > > values of the bound tty to always be 0, which causes the switch
> > > > > from the desktop When to the tty environment, the LED light
> > > > > status is inconsistent with the keyboard lock status.
> > > > > In order to ensure that the keyboard LED lights are displayed
> > > > > normally during the VT switching process, when the VT is
> > > > > switched, the current VT LED configuration is forced to be issued.

> Hi friends, how is this patch progressing now, do I need to modify it further?

At least I have told you already twice that I'm not the guy who suggested this
solution. Others seem gave you other comments.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ