[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YZ+NF8zHqGYfL9eF@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 13:18:15 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Agneli <poczt@...tonmail.ch>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 07/20] ASoC: tegra20: spdif: Set FIFO trigger level
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 03:53:52PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> 25.11.2021 15:28, Mark Brown пишет:
> > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 03:04:35PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> >> This driver never worked before this patchset, hence there is nothing to
> >> backport, this is explained in the cover letter. But in general you're
> >> correct.
> > That's not going to stop the stable people backporting things, and I'd
> > guess it might've worked at some point on some systems - I'm not seeing
> > anything that jumps out as making the driver completely unworkable in
> > your patches.
> I can change commit message with the "fix" word removed, this should
> prevent patch from backporting.
I wouldn't count on it TBH. In any case, definitely no need to resend
for this alone.
> This driver never worked in mainline because S/PDIF device was never
> created, thus driver was never bound. Driver doesn't work properly
> without this patch. Nobody used this driver as-is before this patchset.
Someone might've been using it with an out of tree board file, I guess
on an older stable at this point.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists