[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211125003026.GT641268@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 16:30:26 -0800
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@...cinc.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>, rcu@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] rcu/nocb: Optimize kthreads and rdp initialization
On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 01:37:05AM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> Currently cpumask_available() is used to prevent from unwanted
> NOCB initialization. However if neither "rcu_nocbs=" nor "nohz_full="
> parameters are passed but CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=n, the initialization
> path is still taken, running through all sorts of needless operations
> and iterations on an empty cpumask.
>
> Fix this with relying on a real initialization state instead. This
> also optimize kthreads creation, sparing iteration over all online CPUs
> when nocb isn't initialized.
>
> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
> Cc: Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@...cinc.com>
> Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
> Cc: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>
> Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
> Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>
> ---
> kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h | 24 +++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
> index e1cb06840454..d8ed3ee47a67 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
> @@ -60,6 +60,9 @@ static inline bool rcu_current_is_nocb_kthread(struct rcu_data *rdp)
> * Parse the boot-time rcu_nocb_mask CPU list from the kernel parameters.
> * If the list is invalid, a warning is emitted and all CPUs are offloaded.
> */
> +
> +static bool rcu_nocb_is_setup;
I am taking this as is for now (modulo wordsmithing), but should this
variable instead be in the rcu_state structure? The advantage of putting
it there is keeping the state together. The corresponding disadvantage
is that the state is globally visible within RCU.
Thoughts?
Thanx, Paul
> +
> static int __init rcu_nocb_setup(char *str)
> {
> alloc_bootmem_cpumask_var(&rcu_nocb_mask);
> @@ -67,6 +70,7 @@ static int __init rcu_nocb_setup(char *str)
> pr_warn("rcu_nocbs= bad CPU range, all CPUs set\n");
> cpumask_setall(rcu_nocb_mask);
> }
> + rcu_nocb_is_setup = true;
> return 1;
> }
> __setup("rcu_nocbs=", rcu_nocb_setup);
> @@ -1159,13 +1163,17 @@ void __init rcu_init_nohz(void)
> need_rcu_nocb_mask = true;
> #endif /* #if defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL) */
>
> - if (!cpumask_available(rcu_nocb_mask) && need_rcu_nocb_mask) {
> - if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&rcu_nocb_mask, GFP_KERNEL)) {
> - pr_info("rcu_nocb_mask allocation failed, callback offloading disabled.\n");
> - return;
> + if (need_rcu_nocb_mask) {
> + if (!cpumask_available(rcu_nocb_mask)) {
> + if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&rcu_nocb_mask, GFP_KERNEL)) {
> + pr_info("rcu_nocb_mask allocation failed, callback offloading disabled.\n");
> + return;
> + }
> }
> + rcu_nocb_is_setup = true;
> }
> - if (!cpumask_available(rcu_nocb_mask))
> +
> + if (!rcu_nocb_is_setup)
> return;
>
> #if defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL)
> @@ -1267,8 +1275,10 @@ static void __init rcu_spawn_nocb_kthreads(void)
> {
> int cpu;
>
> - for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
> - rcu_spawn_cpu_nocb_kthread(cpu);
> + if (rcu_nocb_is_setup) {
> + for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
> + rcu_spawn_cpu_nocb_kthread(cpu);
> + }
> }
>
> /* How many CB CPU IDs per GP kthread? Default of -1 for sqrt(nr_cpu_ids). */
> --
> 2.25.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists