[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87lf1cl3cq.ffs@tglx>
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 15:25:09 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: ira.weiny@...el.com, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 03/18] x86/pks: Add additional PKEY helper macros
On Tue, Aug 03 2021 at 21:32, ira weiny wrote:
> @@ -200,16 +200,14 @@ __setup("init_pkru=", setup_init_pkru);
> */
> u32 update_pkey_val(u32 pk_reg, int pkey, unsigned int flags)
> {
> - int pkey_shift = pkey * PKR_BITS_PER_PKEY;
> -
> /* Mask out old bit values */
> - pk_reg &= ~(((1 << PKR_BITS_PER_PKEY) - 1) << pkey_shift);
> + pk_reg &= ~PKR_PKEY_MASK(pkey);
>
> /* Or in new values */
> if (flags & PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS)
> - pk_reg |= PKR_AD_BIT << pkey_shift;
> + pk_reg |= PKR_AD_KEY(pkey);
> if (flags & PKEY_DISABLE_WRITE)
> - pk_reg |= PKR_WD_BIT << pkey_shift;
> + pk_reg |= PKR_WD_KEY(pkey);
I'm not seeing how this is improving that code. Quite the contrary.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists