linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH] acpi/tables: Add AEST in ACPI Table Definition

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <TYCPR01MB61604F59E2F85B1111C8A736E9629@TYCPR01MB6160.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Thu, 25 Nov 2021 00:32:57 +0000
From:   "ishii.shuuichir@...itsu.com" <ishii.shuuichir@...itsu.com>
To:     'Hanjun Guo' <guohanjun@...wei.com>,
        "rafael@...nel.org" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        "lenb@...nel.org" <lenb@...nel.org>,
        "linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "lorenzo.pieralisi@....com" <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
        "sudeep.holla@....com" <sudeep.holla@....com>
CC:     "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] acpi/tables: Add AEST in ACPI Table Definition

Thanks for the review.
We'd like to fix it and repost the v2 patch.

Best regards,
Shuuichirou

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2021 4:11 PM
> To: Ishii, Shuuichirou/石井 周一郎 <ishii.shuuichir@...itsu.com>;
> rafael@...nel.org; lenb@...nel.org; linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org;
> linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: lorenzo.pieralisi@....com; sudeep.holla@....com;
> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] acpi/tables: Add AEST in ACPI Table Definition
> 
> On 2021/11/24 8:52, ishii.shuuichir@...itsu.com wrote:
> > Hi, Hanjun.
> >
> > Thanks for the comment.
> > We apologize for the delay in replying due to my vacation.
> >
> > We understood this to be a point in response to the description of the patch
> comment.
> > What do you think of the following description?
> >
> > When We added AEST using the Upgrading ACPI tables via initrd
> > function, the kernel could not recognize the AEST, so added the AEST
> > table to the list to enable the table upgrade function.
> 
> Looks good to me.
> 
> Thanks
> Hanjun