[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211125010108.GW641268@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 17:01:08 -0800
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@...cinc.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>, rcu@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] rcu/nocb: Last prep work before cpuset interface v2
On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 05:25:34PM +0000, Juri Lelli wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 23/11/21 01:37, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > Changes since v1 after Paul's reviews:
> >
> > * Clarify why the DEL vs ADD possible race on rdp group list is ok [1/6]
> > * Update kernel parameters documentation [5/6]
> > * Only create rcuo[sp] kthreads for CPUs that have ever come online [4/6]
> > * Consider nohz_full= on changelogs
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/frederic/linux-dynticks.git
> > rcu/nocb
> >
> > HEAD: da51363e5ddf54d6ce9c2cfbab946f8914519290
>
> I run this on RT. It survived rcutorture on different kernel cmdline
> configurations and creation of rcuox/N kthreads seemed sane. :)
>
> FWIW, feel free to add
>
> Tested-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>
>
> Thanks for working on this!
And thank you for testing! Applied to all but the first one, which
I will catch on the next rebase.
Thanx, Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists