[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1e75f7ff-4b1b-ff47-2344-903605067693@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2021 18:40:26 +0100
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: Doug Smythies <dsmythies@...us.net>
Cc: Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
lukasz.luba@....com, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/7] powercap/drivers/dtpm: Simplify the dtpm table
On 26/11/2021 18:08, Doug Smythies wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> This patch introduces a regression, at least on my test system.
> I can no longer change CPU frequency scaling drivers, for example
> from intel_cpufreq (A.K.A intel_pstate in passive mode) to intel_pstate
> (A.K.A. active mode). The task just hangs forever.
>
> I bisected the kernel and got this commit as the result.
> As a double check, I reverted this commit:
> 7a89d7eacf8e84f2afb94db5ae9d9f9faa93f01c
> on kernel 5.16-rc2 and the issue was resolved.
>
> While your email is fairly old, I observe that it was only included as of
> kernel 5.16-rc1.
Could it be related to and fixed by:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20211108062345.273855-1-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org/
?
> Command Example that never completes:
>
> $ echo passive | sudo tee /sys/devices/system/cpu/intel_pstate/status
>
> syslog excerpt attached.
>
> ... Doug
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists