lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20211126023156.441292-36-sashal@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 25 Nov 2021 21:31:53 -0500
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     German Gomez <german.gomez@....com>,
        James Clark <james.clark@....com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>,
        Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, peterz@...radead.org,
        mingo@...hat.com, acme@...nel.org, andrew.kilroy@....com,
        linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.15 36/39] perf inject: Fix ARM SPE handling

From: German Gomez <german.gomez@....com>

[ Upstream commit 9e1a8d9f683260d50e0a14176d3f7c46a93b2700 ]

'perf inject' is currently not working for Arm SPE. When you try to run
'perf inject' and 'perf report' with a perf.data file that contains SPE
traces, the tool reports a "Bad address" error:

  # ./perf record -e arm_spe_0/ts_enable=1,store_filter=1,branch_filter=1,load_filter=1/ -a -- sleep 1
  # ./perf inject -i perf.data -o perf.inject.data --itrace
  # ./perf report -i perf.inject.data --stdio

  0x42c00 [0x8]: failed to process type: 9 [Bad address]
  Error:
  failed to process sample

As far as I know, the issue was first spotted in [1], but 'perf inject'
was not yet injecting the samples. This patch does something similar to
what cs_etm does for injecting the samples [2], but for SPE.

[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-kernel/cover/20210412091006.468557-1-leo.yan@linaro.org/#24117339
[2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux.git/tree/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c?h=perf/core&id=133fe2e617e48ca0948983329f43877064ffda3e#n1196

Reviewed-by: James Clark <james.clark@....com>
Signed-off-by: German Gomez <german.gomez@....com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
Cc: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211105104130.28186-2-german.gomez@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 tools/perf/util/arm-spe.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/arm-spe.c b/tools/perf/util/arm-spe.c
index 58b7069c5a5f8..7054f23150e1b 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/arm-spe.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/arm-spe.c
@@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ struct arm_spe {
 	u8				timeless_decoding;
 	u8				data_queued;
 
+	u64				sample_type;
 	u8				sample_flc;
 	u8				sample_llc;
 	u8				sample_tlb;
@@ -248,6 +249,12 @@ static void arm_spe_prep_sample(struct arm_spe *spe,
 	event->sample.header.size = sizeof(struct perf_event_header);
 }
 
+static int arm_spe__inject_event(union perf_event *event, struct perf_sample *sample, u64 type)
+{
+	event->header.size = perf_event__sample_event_size(sample, type, 0);
+	return perf_event__synthesize_sample(event, type, 0, sample);
+}
+
 static inline int
 arm_spe_deliver_synth_event(struct arm_spe *spe,
 			    struct arm_spe_queue *speq __maybe_unused,
@@ -256,6 +263,12 @@ arm_spe_deliver_synth_event(struct arm_spe *spe,
 {
 	int ret;
 
+	if (spe->synth_opts.inject) {
+		ret = arm_spe__inject_event(event, sample, spe->sample_type);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
+	}
+
 	ret = perf_session__deliver_synth_event(spe->session, event, sample);
 	if (ret)
 		pr_err("ARM SPE: failed to deliver event, error %d\n", ret);
@@ -920,6 +933,8 @@ arm_spe_synth_events(struct arm_spe *spe, struct perf_session *session)
 	else
 		attr.sample_type |= PERF_SAMPLE_TIME;
 
+	spe->sample_type = attr.sample_type;
+
 	attr.exclude_user = evsel->core.attr.exclude_user;
 	attr.exclude_kernel = evsel->core.attr.exclude_kernel;
 	attr.exclude_hv = evsel->core.attr.exclude_hv;
-- 
2.33.0

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ