[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9e81f795-6d3a-2078-5ef1-13b965e89a2a@linaro.org>
Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2021 00:10:50 +0100
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: dsmythies@...us.net, rafael@...nel.org
Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
lukasz.luba@....com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powercap/drivers/dtpm: Disable dtpm at boot time
Hi Doug,
I was unable to reproduce the issue because I don't have an x86 platform.
Is it possible to check if this fix is ok?
-- Daniel
On 27/11/2021 00:08, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> The DTPM framework misses a mechanism to set it up. That is currently
> under review but will come after the next cycle.
>
> As the distro are enabling all the kernel options, the DTPM framework
> is enabled on platforms where the energy model is not implemented,
> thus making the framework inconsistent and disrupting the CPU
> frequency scaling service.
>
> Remove the initialization at boot time as a hot fix.
>
> Fixes: 7a89d7eacf8e ("powercap/drivers/dtpm: Simplify the dtpm table")
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
> ---
> drivers/powercap/dtpm.c | 3 ---
> 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/powercap/dtpm.c b/drivers/powercap/dtpm.c
> index b9fac786246a..fb35c5828bfb 100644
> --- a/drivers/powercap/dtpm.c
> +++ b/drivers/powercap/dtpm.c
> @@ -471,9 +471,6 @@ static int __init init_dtpm(void)
> return PTR_ERR(pct);
> }
>
> - for_each_dtpm_table(dtpm_descr)
> - dtpm_descr->init();
> -
> return 0;
> }
> late_initcall(init_dtpm);
>
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists