[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <92c667be-7d33-7742-5fb9-7e5670024911@loongson.cn>
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2021 17:34:36 +0800
From: zhuyinbo <zhuyinbo@...ngson.cn>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>, linux@...linux.org.uk,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, zhuyinbo@...ngson.cn,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
masahiroy@...nel.org, michal.lkml@...kovi.net,
ndesaulniers@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] modpost: file2alias: fixup mdio alias garbled code
in modules.alias
在 2021/11/23 下午9:54, Andrew Lunn 写道:
>>>> Hi Andrew,
>>>>
>>>> Use default mdio configure, After module compilation, mdio alias configure
>>>> is following and it doesn't match
>>>>
>>>> the match phy dev(mdio dev) uevent, because the mdio alias configure
>>>> "0000000101000001000011111001????" include "?" and
>>> A PHY ID generally break up into 3 parts.
>>>
>>> The OUI of the manufacture.
>>> The device.
>>> The revision
>>>
>>> The ? means these bits don't matter. Those correspond to the
>>> revision. Generally, a driver can driver any revision of the PHY,
>>> which is why those bits don't matter.
>>>
>>> So when a driver probes with the id 00000001010000010000111110010110
>>> we expect user space to find the best match, performing wildcard
>>> expansion. So the ? will match anything.
>>>
>>> Since this is worked for a long time, do you have an example where it
>>> is broken? If so, which PHY driver? If it is broken, no driver is
>>> loaded, or the wrong driver is loaded, i expect it is a bug in a
>>> specific driver. And we should fix that bug in the specific driver.
>>>
>>> Andrew
>> Hi Andrew,
>>
>> The string like "0000000101000001000011111001????" dont't match any mdio driver, and i said it include "? that "?" doesn't match any driver, in addition that include Binary digit
>> like "0000000101000001000011111001", that binary digit doesn't match any driver, that should use Hexadecimal for phy id, and I test on some platform, not only a platform, it isn't some
>> specifi driver issue, it is gerneral issue. please you note. that phy driver match phy device must use whole string "MODALIAS=xxxyyzz", not partial match.
> Please give a concrete example. Show us udev logs of it not working,
> it failing to find a match.
>
> Andrew
Hi Andrew,
I don't get udev log, but I can find that phy module wether be load
by lsmod ways, and you can try
it in any a phy deice and in any arch platform. in addition, I
will send v2 version patch that need consider
some phy device doesn't follow IEEE802.3 protocol strictly and
doesn't read phy id from phy register successfully,
please review.
Brs,
Yinbo Zhu.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists