linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 00/10] misc: at25: Code cleanups and improvements

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YaCv+mkge5AqYm8R@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 26 Nov 2021 11:59:22 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Jiri Prchal <jiri.prchal@...ignal.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 00/10] misc: at25: Code cleanups and improvements

On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 11:52:49AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 11:03:26PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 10:31 PM Andy Shevchenko
> > <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:

...

> > It would be nice to change the three remaining board files that fill
> > struct spi_eeprom so they use device properties and unify the
> > rest of the probe path. Not sure how much of a change that would
> > be.
> 
> Do you have a chance to test that if it appears to be the case?

There is one more, actually: arch/mips/txx9/generic/spi_eeprom.c.

But above perhaps some OMAP people can help with... Dunno.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko