linux-kernel - Re: [FYI][PATCH 1/1] tools headers UAPI: Sync s390 syscall table file changed by new futex

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 26 Nov 2021 07:01:16 -0300
From:   Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@...il.com>
To:     Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
CC:     Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [FYI][PATCH 1/1] tools headers UAPI: Sync s390 syscall table file changed by new futex_waitv syscall Reply-To:



On November 26, 2021 6:53:07 AM GMT-03:00, Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
>Hi Arnaldo,
>
>> To pick the changes in this cset:
>> 
>>   6c122360cf2f4c5a ("s390: wire up sys_futex_waitv system call")
>> 
>> That add support for this new syscall in tools such as 'perf trace'.
>...
>> This addresses this perf build warnings:
>> 
>>   Warning: Kernel ABI header at 'tools/perf/arch/s390/entry/syscalls/syscall.tbl' differs from latest version at 'arch/s390/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl'
>>   diff -u tools/perf/arch/s390/entry/syscalls/syscall.tbl arch/s390/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl
>> 
>> Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
>> Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
>> ---
>>  tools/perf/arch/s390/entry/syscalls/syscall.tbl | 1 +
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
>I can happily pick this up for the s390 tree, but I'm not sure if that
>is want you want?

Just FYI and to give the opportunity to people to chime in in case something is wrong somehow.

Also to advertise the feature.

I'm pushing this upstream myself,

Thanks,

- Arnaldo