linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] arm64: Enable KCSAN

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2ec0f613-1fad-f64a-4dd5-ba2a7a93dad3@huawei.com>
Date:   Fri, 26 Nov 2021 20:02:32 +0800
From:   Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
To:     Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
CC:     Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: Enable KCSAN


On 2021/11/26 18:39, Marco Elver wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 04:00PM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
>> This patch enables KCSAN for arm64, with updates to build rules
>> to not use KCSAN for several incompatible compilation units.
>>
>> Tested selftest and kcsan_test, and all passed.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
> Nice! Although I think Mark (Cc'd) also had been working on this and
> probably knows what, if anything, is still missing.
>
> For one, have you tested gcc 11? To make it work with gcc 11, my
> preferred solution is that you simply squash this:
I only have gcc10,  will try gcc 11.
>
> ---
>
> diff --git a/kernel/kcsan/Makefile b/kernel/kcsan/Makefile
> index c2bb07f5bcc7..d7d0b51b79f5 100644
> --- a/kernel/kcsan/Makefile
> +++ b/kernel/kcsan/Makefile
> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ CFLAGS_REMOVE_debugfs.o = $(CC_FLAGS_FTRACE)
>   CFLAGS_REMOVE_report.o = $(CC_FLAGS_FTRACE)
>   
>   CFLAGS_core.o := $(call cc-option,-fno-conserve-stack) \
> +		 $(call cc-option,-mno-outline-atomics) \
>   	-fno-stack-protector -DDISABLE_BRANCH_PROFILING
>   
>   obj-y := core.o debugfs.o report.o
>
> ---
>
> [ I have changes to kernel/kcsan/Makefile that I expect to land in -next
>    soon'ish, the above is small enough that git can auto-merge. ]
>
> gcc somehow made outline-atomics the default (unlike clang), which will
> cause linker errors for kernel/kcsan/core.o. While the support for
> builtin atomics shouldn't be required on arm64, I want it to be
> (compile-)testable on all architectures. Although there's an exception
> that certain compiler instrumentation actually require working builtin
> atomics support, specifically GCOV_KERNEL.
Thanks for your infos, I will try to test it.
> Thanks,
> -- Marco
>
>