linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] KVM: Scalable memslots implementation additional patches

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4062e0ca-88cf-3521-3cf1-b420fc6ca2f6@maciej.szmigiero.name>
Date:   Fri, 26 Nov 2021 14:18:22 +0100
From:   "Maciej S. Szmigiero" <mail@...iej.szmigiero.name>
To:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc:     Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        Igor Mammedov <imammedo@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] KVM: Scalable memslots implementation additional
 patches

On 26.11.2021 11:35, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 11/26/21 01:31, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
>> From: "Maciej S. Szmigiero"<maciej.szmigiero@...cle.com>
>>
>> While the last "5.5" version of KVM scalable memslots implementation was
>> merged to kvm/queue some changes from its review round are still pending.
> 
> You can go ahead and post v6, I'll replace.

Which tree should I target then?
kvm/queue already has these commits so git refuses to rebase on top of it.

By the way, v6 will have more changes than this series since there will be
patches for intermediate forms of code, too.

> However, note that I would prefer the current form instead of patch 2's atomic_long_cmpxchg.

Understood.

> Paolo

Thanks,
Maciej