linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] platform/x86: pmc_atom: improve critclk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHp75Vf6x4-AYPPEMf7qXTi-RF92mdUn6rhghBpJ5avQAjYRzA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 26 Nov 2021 16:51:00 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Henning Schild <henning.schild@...mens.com>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux LED Subsystem <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>,
        Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
        Srikanth Krishnakar <skrishnakar@...il.com>,
        Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>,
        Gerd Haeussler <gerd.haeussler.ext@...mens.com>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
        Mark Gross <mgross@...ux.intel.com>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Enrico Weigelt <lkml@...ux.net>,
        Michael Haener <michael.haener@...mens.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] platform/x86: pmc_atom: improve critclk_systems
 matching for Siemens PCs

On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 4:10 PM Henning Schild
<henning.schild@...mens.com> wrote:
>
> Siemens industrial PCs unfortunately can not always be properly
> identified the way we used to. An earlier commit introduced code that
> allows proper identification without looking at DMI strings that could
> differ based on product branding.
> Switch over to that proper way and revert commits that used to collect
> the machines based on unstable strings.

Usually we start a series with fixes, but I guess it's fine here since
this can be taken separately, right?

...

> +#include <linux/platform_data/x86/simatic-ipc.h>

Seems not.  Question is then, what Fixes tags would  mean in this case?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko