[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <22137816.pfsBpAd9cS@tauon.chronox.de>
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2021 17:15:59 +0100
From: Stephan Mueller <smueller@...onox.de>
To: Simo Sorce <simo@...hat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>, Tso Ted <tytso@....edu>,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
Nicolai Stange <nstange@...e.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
"Alexander E. Patrakov" <patrakov@...il.com>,
"Ahmed S. Darwish" <darwish.07@...il.com>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
Vito Caputo <vcaputo@...garu.com>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Ray Strode <rstrode@...hat.com>,
William Jon McCann <mccann@....edu>,
zhangjs <zachary@...shancloud.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>,
Lennart Poettering <mzxreary@...inter.de>,
Peter Matthias <matthias.peter@....bund.de>,
Marcelo Henrique Cerri <marcelo.cerri@...onical.com>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@...hat.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...ia.fr>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
Andy Lavr <andy.lavr@...il.com>,
Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>,
Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@...e.cz>,
John Haxby <john.haxby@...cle.com>,
Alexander Lobakin <alobakin@...lbox.org>,
Jirka Hladky <jhladky@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v43 01/15] Linux Random Number Generator
Am Freitag, 26. November 2021, 16:44:17 CET schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman:
Hi Greg,
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 09:59:01AM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > Jason,
> > have you previously produced a list of reasoned concerns with this
> > patchset and direction?
> >
> > This specific email is not really useful to me to understand the
> > concerns as it does not contain actionable suggestion or critique.
> >
> > I personally find the direction fine, and with my distribution hat on I
> > can say that FIPS is essential for us and any design must include an
> > option to be FIPS certifiable.
> >
> > As NIST keeps improving their testing capabilities and rigorous
> > cryptographic design of the CSPRNGs as well as entropy sources the
> > kernel must also adapt.
> >
> > Stephan is providing a path forward, and I haven't seen any other
> > proposal, let alone code, that provide improvements in this area.
> > I am pretty sure the design can be improved if there is detailed and
> > actionable feedback on what to change.
> >
> > I hope the path forward can be one of collaboration rather then mere
> > opposition.
>
> Replacement of the existing code to cut over to the new one is not
> collaboration, it's the exact opposite.
>
> Submitting patches to the existing codebase to implement the
> "requirements" is the proper way forward, why has that never been done.
It has been attempted by Nikolai Stange without avail - no comments were
received, let alone it was integrated.
>
> Remember, evolution is the correct way of kernel development, not
> intelligent design :)
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Ciao
Stephan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists