linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 09/17] KEYS: Rename get_builtin_and_secondary

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <fb1d583f588e3f46fdadbe3cf6288bb098ff45f8.camel@kernel.org>
Date:   Sat, 27 Nov 2021 02:49:28 +0200
From:   Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
To:     Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg@...cle.com>, keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, zohar@...ux.ibm.com,
        dhowells@...hat.com, dwmw2@...radead.org,
        herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, davem@...emloft.net,
        jmorris@...ei.org, serge@...lyn.com
Cc:     keescook@...omium.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        weiyongjun1@...wei.com, nayna@...ux.ibm.com, ebiggers@...gle.com,
        ardb@...nel.org, nramas@...ux.microsoft.com, lszubowi@...hat.com,
        jason@...c4.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
        James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com, pjones@...hat.com,
        konrad.wilk@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 09/17] KEYS: Rename
 get_builtin_and_secondary_restriction

On Tue, 2021-11-23 at 23:41 -0500, Eric Snowberg wrote:
> In preparation for returning either the existing
> restrict_link_by_builtin_and_secondary_trusted or the upcoming
> restriction that includes the trusted builtin, secondary and
> machine keys, to improve clarity, rename
> get_builtin_and_secondary_restriction to get_secondary_restriction.
> 
> Suggested-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg@...cle.com>
> Reviewed-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>
> ---
> v6: Initial version
> v7: Unmodified from v7
> v8: Code unmodified from v7, added Mimi's Reviewed-by
> ---
>  certs/system_keyring.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/certs/system_keyring.c b/certs/system_keyring.c
> index 692365dee2bd..8f1f87579819 100644
> --- a/certs/system_keyring.c
> +++ b/certs/system_keyring.c
> @@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ int restrict_link_by_builtin_and_secondary_trusted(
>   * Allocate a struct key_restriction for the "builtin and secondary trust"
>   * keyring. Only for use in system_trusted_keyring_init().
>   */
> -static __init struct key_restriction *get_builtin_and_secondary_restriction(void)
> +static __init struct key_restriction *get_secondary_restriction(void)
>  {
>         struct key_restriction *restriction;
>  
> @@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ static __init int system_trusted_keyring_init(void)
>                                KEY_USR_VIEW | KEY_USR_READ | KEY_USR_SEARCH |
>                                KEY_USR_WRITE),
>                               KEY_ALLOC_NOT_IN_QUOTA,
> -                             get_builtin_and_secondary_restriction(),
> +                             get_secondary_restriction(),
>                               NULL);
>         if (IS_ERR(secondary_trusted_keys))
>                 panic("Can't allocate secondary trusted keyring\n");

This is wrong order.

You should first do the changes that make the old name
obsolete and only after that have a patch that does the
rename. Unfortunately, this patch cannot possibly acked
with the current order.


/Jarkko