[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YaIllD3pSVCI/gbj@kroah.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2021 13:33:24 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
Marc Zygnier <maz@...nel.org>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
Megha Dey <megha.dey@...el.com>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Jon Mason <jdmason@...zu.us>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
Allen Hubbe <allenbh@...il.com>, linux-ntb@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [patch 32/32] genirq/msi: Convert storage to xarray
On Sat, Nov 27, 2021 at 02:23:17AM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> The current linked list storage for MSI descriptors is suboptimal in
> several ways:
>
> 1) Looking up a MSI desciptor requires a O(n) list walk in the worst case
>
> 2) The upcoming support of runtime expansion of MSI-X vectors would need
> to do a full list walk to figure out whether a particular index is
> already associated.
>
> 3) Runtime expansion of sparse allocations is even more complex as the
> current implementation assumes an ordered list (increasing MSI index).
>
> Use an xarray which solves all of the above problems nicely.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> ---
> include/linux/msi.h | 19 ++---
> kernel/irq/msi.c | 188 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------------
> 2 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 117 deletions(-)
Much simpler code too, nice!
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists