lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211127184920.2a9c986d@jic23-huawei>
Date:   Sat, 27 Nov 2021 18:49:20 +0000
From:   Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To:     Nikita Travkin <nikita@...n.ru>
Cc:     lars@...afoo.de, robh+dt@...nel.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] iio: ltr501: Export near level property for
 proximity sensor

On Thu, 25 Nov 2021 17:56:46 +0500
Nikita Travkin <nikita@...n.ru> wrote:

> Userspace tools like iio-sensor-proxy need to know the proximity level
> that should be considered "near". This value is hardware-specific and
> can be defined via the devicetree. Allow the driver to export the near
> level.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nikita Travkin <nikita@...n.ru>

Hi Nikita,

This looks fine to me, but I'd like to leave a little time for others
to look including DT review.

Thanks,

Jonathan

> 
> ---
> The changes are mostly copied from vcnl4000 patchset introducing the
> property:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/cover.1586094535.git.agx@sigxcpu.org/
> ---
>  drivers/iio/light/ltr501.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/light/ltr501.c b/drivers/iio/light/ltr501.c
> index 64ba04c275e8..47d61ec2bb50 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/light/ltr501.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/light/ltr501.c
> @@ -166,6 +166,7 @@ struct ltr501_data {
>  	struct regmap_field *reg_ps_rate;
>  	struct regmap_field *reg_als_prst;
>  	struct regmap_field *reg_ps_prst;
> +	uint32_t near_level;
>  };
>  
>  static const struct ltr501_samp_table ltr501_als_samp_table[] = {
> @@ -525,6 +526,25 @@ static int ltr501_write_intr_prst(struct ltr501_data *data,
>  	return -EINVAL;
>  }
>  
> +static ssize_t ltr501_read_near_level(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> +				      uintptr_t priv,
> +				      const struct iio_chan_spec *chan,
> +				      char *buf)
> +{
> +	struct ltr501_data *data = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> +
> +	return sprintf(buf, "%u\n", data->near_level);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct iio_chan_spec_ext_info ltr501_ext_info[] = {
> +	{
> +		.name = "nearlevel",
> +		.shared = IIO_SEPARATE,
> +		.read = ltr501_read_near_level,
> +	},
> +	{ /* sentinel */ }
> +};
> +
>  static const struct iio_event_spec ltr501_als_event_spec[] = {
>  	{
>  		.type = IIO_EV_TYPE_THRESH,
> @@ -609,6 +629,7 @@ static const struct iio_chan_spec ltr501_channels[] = {
>  		},
>  		.event_spec = ltr501_pxs_event_spec,
>  		.num_event_specs = ARRAY_SIZE(ltr501_pxs_event_spec),
> +		.ext_info = ltr501_ext_info,
>  	},
>  	IIO_CHAN_SOFT_TIMESTAMP(3),
>  };
> @@ -1531,6 +1552,10 @@ static int ltr501_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>  	if ((partid >> 4) != data->chip_info->partid)
>  		return -ENODEV;
>  
> +	if (device_property_read_u32(&client->dev, "proximity-near-level",
> +				     &data->near_level))
> +		data->near_level = 0;
> +
>  	indio_dev->info = data->chip_info->info;
>  	indio_dev->channels = data->chip_info->channels;
>  	indio_dev->num_channels = data->chip_info->no_channels;

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ