linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 14/20] mfd: intel_soc_pmic_chtwc: Add intel_cht_wc_get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <75f4e158-3099-b138-8412-d3a987622c0a@redhat.com>
Date:   Sun, 28 Nov 2021 10:53:06 +0100
From:   Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc:     "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
        Mark Gross <markgross@...nel.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
        Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
        MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
        Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Yauhen Kharuzhy <jekhor@...il.com>,
        Tsuchiya Yuto <kitakar@...il.com>,
        Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-i2c <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-efi <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 14/20] mfd: intel_soc_pmic_chtwc: Add
 intel_cht_wc_get_model() helper function

Hi,

On 11/16/21 12:18, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 14, 2021 at 7:04 PM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com> wrote:
>>
>> Tablet / laptop designs using an Intel Cherry Trail x86 main SoC with
>> an Intel Whiskey Cove PMIC do not use a single standard setup for
> 
> does not

designs ... do not. Design_s_ so more then one, so "do not" is correct.

<snip>

>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(intel_cht_wc_get_model);
> 
> Are you planning to use EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL_NS()? If not, please consider it.

This will be gone in v3, since this info is now stored in struct intel_soc_pmic
as requested by Chanwoo.

Regards,

Hans