linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v15 00/39] NVIDIA Tegra power management patches for 5.17

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 29 Nov 2021 01:03:18 +0300
From:   Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
To:     Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>
Cc:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>,
        Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@...dia.com>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
        Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, David Heidelberg <david@...t.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 00/39] NVIDIA Tegra power management patches for 5.17

28.11.2021 08:40, Michał Mirosław пишет:
> On Sun, Nov 14, 2021 at 10:33:56PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> This series adds runtime PM support to Tegra drivers and enables core
>> voltage scaling for Tegra20/30 SoCs, resolving overheating troubles.
>>
>> All patches in this series are interdependent and should go via Tegra tree
>> for simplicity.
> [...]
> 
> I would suggest pushing all the fixes to the front of the series (those are
> at least patches 1, 3, 17, 27-31 and 39).

All those patches, apart from 17, should be irrelevant to stable kernel.
There is no real benefit in reordering them, IMO. The patches are
grouped logically in this series.

In the case of patch 17, perhaps won't hurt to add stable tag to it.
Then the "drm/tegra: submit:" patches could be swapped to prioritize the
fix, though there is no danger of a merge conflict there.