[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20211129181722.872612511@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 19:18:33 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Tony Lu <tonylu@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Wen Gu <guwen@...ux.alibaba.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.15 119/179] net/smc: Ensure the active closing peer first closes clcsock
From: Tony Lu <tonylu@...ux.alibaba.com>
[ Upstream commit 606a63c9783a32a45bd2ef0eee393711d75b3284 ]
The side that actively closed socket, it's clcsock doesn't enter
TIME_WAIT state, but the passive side does it. It should show the same
behavior as TCP sockets.
Consider this, when client actively closes the socket, the clcsock in
server enters TIME_WAIT state, which means the address is occupied and
won't be reused before TIME_WAIT dismissing. If we restarted server, the
service would be unavailable for a long time.
To solve this issue, shutdown the clcsock in [A], perform the TCP active
close progress first, before the passive closed side closing it. So that
the actively closed side enters TIME_WAIT, not the passive one.
Client | Server
close() // client actively close |
smc_release() |
smc_close_active() // PEERCLOSEWAIT1 |
smc_close_final() // abort or closed = 1|
smc_cdc_get_slot_and_msg_send() |
[A] |
|smc_cdc_msg_recv_action() // ACTIVE
| queue_work(smc_close_wq, &conn->close_work)
| smc_close_passive_work() // PROCESSABORT or APPCLOSEWAIT1
| smc_close_passive_abort_received() // only in abort
|
|close() // server recv zero, close
| smc_release() // PROCESSABORT or APPCLOSEWAIT1
| smc_close_active()
| smc_close_abort() or smc_close_final() // CLOSED
| smc_cdc_get_slot_and_msg_send() // abort or closed = 1
smc_cdc_msg_recv_action() | smc_clcsock_release()
queue_work(smc_close_wq, &conn->close_work) | sock_release(tcp) // actively close clc, enter TIME_WAIT
smc_close_passive_work() // PEERCLOSEWAIT1 | smc_conn_free()
smc_close_passive_abort_received() // CLOSED|
smc_conn_free() |
smc_clcsock_release() |
sock_release(tcp) // passive close clc |
Link: https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg780407.html
Fixes: b38d732477e4 ("smc: socket closing and linkgroup cleanup")
Signed-off-by: Tony Lu <tonylu@...ux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Wen Gu <guwen@...ux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
net/smc/smc_close.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/smc/smc_close.c b/net/smc/smc_close.c
index 0f9ffba07d268..04620b53b74a7 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_close.c
+++ b/net/smc/smc_close.c
@@ -228,6 +228,12 @@ int smc_close_active(struct smc_sock *smc)
/* send close request */
rc = smc_close_final(conn);
sk->sk_state = SMC_PEERCLOSEWAIT1;
+
+ /* actively shutdown clcsock before peer close it,
+ * prevent peer from entering TIME_WAIT state.
+ */
+ if (smc->clcsock && smc->clcsock->sk)
+ rc = kernel_sock_shutdown(smc->clcsock, SHUT_RDWR);
} else {
/* peer event has changed the state */
goto again;
--
2.33.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists