[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211129034328.1604-1-longpeng2@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 11:43:28 +0800
From: "Longpeng(Mike)" <longpeng2@...wei.com>
To: <pbonzini@...hat.com>
CC: <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>, <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <arei.gonglei@...wei.com>,
Longpeng <longpeng2@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH] kvm/eventfd: fix the misleading comment in kvm_irqfd_assign
From: Longpeng <longpeng2@...wei.com>
The comment above the invocation of vfs_poll() is misleading, move
it to the right place.
Fixes: 684a0b719ddb ("KVM: eventfd: Fix lock order inversion")
Signed-off-by: Longpeng <longpeng2@...wei.com>
---
virt/kvm/eventfd.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/virt/kvm/eventfd.c b/virt/kvm/eventfd.c
index 2ad013b..cd01814 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/eventfd.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/eventfd.c
@@ -406,12 +406,12 @@ bool __attribute__((weak)) kvm_arch_irqfd_route_changed(
spin_unlock_irq(&kvm->irqfds.lock);
+ events = vfs_poll(f.file, &irqfd->pt);
+
/*
* Check if there was an event already pending on the eventfd
* before we registered, and trigger it as if we didn't miss it.
*/
- events = vfs_poll(f.file, &irqfd->pt);
-
if (events & EPOLLIN)
schedule_work(&irqfd->inject);
--
1.8.3.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists