[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20211129174654.668506-3-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 18:46:45 +0100
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH 02/11] locking: Remove rt_rwlock_is_contended().
rt_rwlock_is_contended() has not users. It makes no sense to use it as
rwlock_is_contended() because it is a sleeping lock on RT and preemption
is possible. It reports always != 0 if used by a writer and even if
there is a waiter then the lock might not be handed over if the
current owner has the highest priority.
Remove rt_rwlock_is_contended().
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
---
kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c | 6 ------
1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c b/kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c
index b2e553f9255bf..9e396a09fe0fd 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c
@@ -257,12 +257,6 @@ void __sched rt_write_unlock(rwlock_t *rwlock)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(rt_write_unlock);
-int __sched rt_rwlock_is_contended(rwlock_t *rwlock)
-{
- return rw_base_is_contended(&rwlock->rwbase);
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(rt_rwlock_is_contended);
-
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
void __rt_rwlock_init(rwlock_t *rwlock, const char *name,
struct lock_class_key *key)
--
2.34.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists