[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YaVaTwjiZmWz8PKY@fedora>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 17:55:11 -0500
From: Dennis Zhou <dennis@...nel.org>
To: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, tj@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
cl@...ux.com, catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org,
tsbogend@...ha.franken.de, mpe@...erman.id.au,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org,
paul.walmsley@...ive.com, palmer@...belt.com,
aou@...s.berkeley.edu, davem@...emloft.net, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
hpa@...or.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/4] mm: percpu: Cleanup percpu first chunk funciton
Hello,
On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 05:35:53PM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
> When support page mapping percpu first chunk allocator on arm64, we
> found there are lots of duplicated codes in percpu embed/page first
> chunk allocator. This patchset is aimed to cleanup them and should
> no funciton change, only test on arm64.
>
> Kefeng Wang (4):
> mm: percpu: Generalize percpu related config
> mm: percpu: Add pcpu_fc_cpu_to_node_fn_t typedef
> mm: percpu: Add generic pcpu_fc_alloc/free funciton
> mm: percpu: Add generic pcpu_populate_pte() function
>
> arch/arm64/Kconfig | 20 +----
> arch/ia64/Kconfig | 9 +--
> arch/mips/Kconfig | 10 +--
> arch/mips/mm/init.c | 14 +---
> arch/powerpc/Kconfig | 17 +---
> arch/powerpc/kernel/setup_64.c | 92 +--------------------
> arch/riscv/Kconfig | 10 +--
> arch/sparc/Kconfig | 12 +--
> arch/sparc/kernel/smp_64.c | 105 +-----------------------
> arch/x86/Kconfig | 17 +---
> arch/x86/kernel/setup_percpu.c | 66 ++-------------
> drivers/base/arch_numa.c | 68 +---------------
> include/linux/percpu.h | 13 +--
> mm/Kconfig | 12 +++
> mm/percpu.c | 143 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 15 files changed, 165 insertions(+), 443 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.26.2
>
I've made a few comments. I think this will be a little bit of a
challenge to get through due to it touching so many architectures. For
ease, it probably makes sense to run it through mny tree, but we'll need
explicit acks as I mentioned.
I like getting rid of the pcpu_alloc_bootmem()/pcpu_free_bootmem()
functions. However, let's keep the implementation identical to x86.
I don't think we should get rid of the populate_pte_fn(). I'm not
comfortable changing x86's implementation. Simply offer a NULL, and if
NULL use the default.
Do you have a tree that intel pulls? I suggest cleaning up the patches
and pushing to a remote branch that they pick up. That would have caught
the mips typo. Send a PR creating a file in [1] for your branch, github
is fine. Basic validation needs to be done before I can pick this up
too on more than arm64.
[1] https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/tree/master/repo/linux
Thanks,
Dennis
Powered by blists - more mailing lists