| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20211129181720.278377881@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 19:17:14 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
syzbot+ff49a3059d49b0ca0eec@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
syzbot+847f02ec20a6609a328b@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
syzbot+3368aadcd30425ceb53b@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
syzbot+51ce8887cdef77c9ac83@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
syzbot+3cb756a49d2f394a9ee3@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, stable@...nel.org
Subject: [PATCH 5.15 040/179] io_uring: fix link traversal locking
From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
commit 6af3f48bf6156a7f02e91aca64e2927c4bebda03 upstream.
WARNING: inconsistent lock state
5.16.0-rc2-syzkaller #0 Not tainted
inconsistent {HARDIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-HARDIRQ-W} usage.
ffff888078e11418 (&ctx->timeout_lock
){?.+.}-{2:2}
, at: io_timeout_fn+0x6f/0x360 fs/io_uring.c:5943
{HARDIRQ-ON-W} state was registered at:
[...]
spin_unlock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:399 [inline]
__io_poll_remove_one fs/io_uring.c:5669 [inline]
__io_poll_remove_one fs/io_uring.c:5654 [inline]
io_poll_remove_one+0x236/0x870 fs/io_uring.c:5680
io_poll_remove_all+0x1af/0x235 fs/io_uring.c:5709
io_ring_ctx_wait_and_kill+0x1cc/0x322 fs/io_uring.c:9534
io_uring_release+0x42/0x46 fs/io_uring.c:9554
__fput+0x286/0x9f0 fs/file_table.c:280
task_work_run+0xdd/0x1a0 kernel/task_work.c:164
exit_task_work include/linux/task_work.h:32 [inline]
do_exit+0xc14/0x2b40 kernel/exit.c:832
674ee8e1b4a41 ("io_uring: correct link-list traversal locking") fixed a
data race but introduced a possible deadlock and inconsistentcy in irq
states. E.g.
io_poll_remove_all()
spin_lock_irq(timeout_lock)
io_poll_remove_one()
spin_lock/unlock_irq(poll_lock);
spin_unlock_irq(timeout_lock)
Another type of problem is freeing a request while holding
->timeout_lock, which may leads to a deadlock in
io_commit_cqring() -> io_flush_timeouts() and other places.
Having 3 nested locks is also too ugly. Add io_match_task_safe(), which
would briefly take and release timeout_lock for race prevention inside,
so the actuall request cancellation / free / etc. code doesn't have it
taken.
Reported-by: syzbot+ff49a3059d49b0ca0eec@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+847f02ec20a6609a328b@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+3368aadcd30425ceb53b@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+51ce8887cdef77c9ac83@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+3cb756a49d2f394a9ee3@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: 674ee8e1b4a41 ("io_uring: correct link-list traversal locking")
Cc: stable@...nel.org # 5.15+
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/397f7ebf3f4171f1abe41f708ac1ecb5766f0b68.1637937097.git.asml.silence@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
fs/io_uring.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -1204,6 +1204,7 @@ static void io_refs_resurrect(struct per
static bool io_match_task(struct io_kiocb *head, struct task_struct *task,
bool cancel_all)
+ __must_hold(&req->ctx->timeout_lock)
{
struct io_kiocb *req;
@@ -1219,6 +1220,44 @@ static bool io_match_task(struct io_kioc
return false;
}
+static bool io_match_linked(struct io_kiocb *head)
+{
+ struct io_kiocb *req;
+
+ io_for_each_link(req, head) {
+ if (req->flags & REQ_F_INFLIGHT)
+ return true;
+ }
+ return false;
+}
+
+/*
+ * As io_match_task() but protected against racing with linked timeouts.
+ * User must not hold timeout_lock.
+ */
+static bool io_match_task_safe(struct io_kiocb *head, struct task_struct *task,
+ bool cancel_all)
+{
+ bool matched;
+
+ if (task && head->task != task)
+ return false;
+ if (cancel_all)
+ return true;
+
+ if (head->flags & REQ_F_LINK_TIMEOUT) {
+ struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = head->ctx;
+
+ /* protect against races with linked timeouts */
+ spin_lock_irq(&ctx->timeout_lock);
+ matched = io_match_linked(head);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->timeout_lock);
+ } else {
+ matched = io_match_linked(head);
+ }
+ return matched;
+}
+
static inline void req_set_fail(struct io_kiocb *req)
{
req->flags |= REQ_F_FAIL;
@@ -5697,17 +5736,15 @@ static bool io_poll_remove_all(struct io
int posted = 0, i;
spin_lock(&ctx->completion_lock);
- spin_lock_irq(&ctx->timeout_lock);
for (i = 0; i < (1U << ctx->cancel_hash_bits); i++) {
struct hlist_head *list;
list = &ctx->cancel_hash[i];
hlist_for_each_entry_safe(req, tmp, list, hash_node) {
- if (io_match_task(req, tsk, cancel_all))
+ if (io_match_task_safe(req, tsk, cancel_all))
posted += io_poll_remove_one(req);
}
}
- spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->timeout_lock);
spin_unlock(&ctx->completion_lock);
if (posted)
@@ -9520,19 +9557,8 @@ static bool io_cancel_task_cb(struct io_
{
struct io_kiocb *req = container_of(work, struct io_kiocb, work);
struct io_task_cancel *cancel = data;
- bool ret;
- if (!cancel->all && (req->flags & REQ_F_LINK_TIMEOUT)) {
- struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx;
-
- /* protect against races with linked timeouts */
- spin_lock_irq(&ctx->timeout_lock);
- ret = io_match_task(req, cancel->task, cancel->all);
- spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->timeout_lock);
- } else {
- ret = io_match_task(req, cancel->task, cancel->all);
- }
- return ret;
+ return io_match_task_safe(req, cancel->task, cancel->all);
}
static bool io_cancel_defer_files(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
@@ -9542,14 +9568,12 @@ static bool io_cancel_defer_files(struct
LIST_HEAD(list);
spin_lock(&ctx->completion_lock);
- spin_lock_irq(&ctx->timeout_lock);
list_for_each_entry_reverse(de, &ctx->defer_list, list) {
- if (io_match_task(de->req, task, cancel_all)) {
+ if (io_match_task_safe(de->req, task, cancel_all)) {
list_cut_position(&list, &ctx->defer_list, &de->list);
break;
}
}
- spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->timeout_lock);
spin_unlock(&ctx->completion_lock);
if (list_empty(&list))
return false;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists