lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 29 Nov 2021 15:11:54 +0800
From:   Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@...gle.com>
To:     "allen-kh.cheng" <allen-kh.cheng@...iatek.com>
Cc:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>,
        Linux-ALSA <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
        cujomalainey@...gle.com,
        Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@...ux.intel.com>,
        Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
        sound-open-firmware@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/3] firmware: mediatek: add adsp ipc protocol
 interface

On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 02:39:53PM +0800, allen-kh.cheng wrote:
> Reviewed-by: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@...gle.com>
> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
> Signed-off-by: Allen-KH Cheng <Allen-KH.Cheng@...iatek.com>

Please double check again if you use the R-b tags correctly.  I have provided my R-b tag before but have some more minor comments below.

With the minor comments:
Reviewed-by: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@...gle.com>

> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/mediatek/mtk-adsp-ipc.c b/drivers/firmware/mediatek/mtk-adsp-ipc.c
[...]
> +int adsp_ipc_send(struct mtk_adsp_ipc *ipc, unsigned int idx, uint32_t op)
> +{
> +     struct mtk_adsp_chan *dsp_chan;
> +     struct adsp_mbox_ch_info *ch_info;
> +     int ret;
> +
> +     if (idx >= MTK_ADSP_MBOX_NUM)
> +             return -EINVAL;
> +
> +     dsp_chan = &ipc->chans[idx];
> +     ch_info = dsp_chan->ch->con_priv;
> +     ch_info->ipc_op_val = op;
> +     ret = mbox_send_message(dsp_chan->ch, NULL);
> +     if (ret < 0)
> +             return ret;
> +
> +     return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(adsp_ipc_send);

To be neat, I think use mtk_adsp for all names looks better.  I.e. s/adsp_ipc_send/mtk_adsp_ipc_send/.

> +static void adsp_ipc_recv(struct mbox_client *c, void *msg)
> +{

Ditto, mtk_adsp_ipc_recv looks better to me.

> diff --git a/include/linux/firmware/mediatek/mtk-adsp-ipc.h b/include/linux/firmware/mediatek/mtk-adsp-ipc.h
[...]
> +struct adsp_mbox_ch_info {
> +     u32 ipc_op_val;
> +     void __iomem *va_reg;
> +};

Ditto, mtk_adsp_mbox_ch_info.

> +static inline void adsp_ipc_set_data(struct mtk_adsp_ipc *ipc, void *data)
> +{

mtk_adsp_ipc_set_data, although there is no use case yet.

> +static inline void *adsp_ipc_get_data(struct mtk_adsp_ipc *ipc)
> +{

mtk_adsp_ipc_get_data, although there is no use case yet.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ