[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <OSBPR01MB4600E123FC87D7A27517A2DFF7669@OSBPR01MB4600.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 07:59:05 +0000
From: "nakamura.shun@...itsu.com" <nakamura.shun@...itsu.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
CC: "peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com"
<alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
"namhyung@...nel.org" <namhyung@...nel.org>,
"robh@...nel.org" <robh@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org" <linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] libperf: Move perf_counts_values__scale to
tools/lib/perf
Hi Arnaldo, jirka
Sorry for the late reply.
Em Sun, Nov 14, 2021 at 05:19:45PM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 05:58:29PM +0900, Shunsuke Nakamura wrote:
> > > Move perf_counts_values__scale from tools/perf/util to tools/lib/perf
> > > so that it can be used with libperf.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Shunsuke Nakamura <nakamura.shun@...itsu.com>
> > > ---
> > > tools/lib/perf/evsel.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> > > tools/lib/perf/include/perf/evsel.h | 4 ++++
> > > tools/lib/perf/libperf.map | 1 +
> > > tools/perf/util/evsel.c | 19 -------------------
> > > tools/perf/util/evsel.h | 3 ---
> > > 5 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/tools/lib/perf/evsel.c b/tools/lib/perf/evsel.c
> > > index 8441e3e1aaac..5097aadea37a 100644
> > > --- a/tools/lib/perf/evsel.c
> > > +++ b/tools/lib/perf/evsel.c
> > > @@ -431,3 +431,22 @@ void perf_evsel__free_id(struct perf_evsel *evsel)
> > > zfree(&evsel->id);
> > > evsel->ids = 0;
> > > }
> > > +
> > > +void perf_counts_values__scale(struct perf_counts_values *count,
> > > + bool scale, s8 *pscaled)
> > > +{
> > > + s8 scaled = 0;
> > > +
> > > + if (scale) {
> > > + if (count->run == 0) {
> > > + scaled = -1;
> > > + count->val = 0;
> > > + } else if (count->run < count->ena) {
> > > + scaled = 1;
> > > + count->val = (u64)((double)count->val * count->ena / count->run);
> > > + }
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + if (pscaled)
> > > + *pscaled = scaled;
> > > +}
> > > diff --git a/tools/lib/perf/include/perf/evsel.h b/tools/lib/perf/include/perf/evsel.h
> > > index 60eae25076d3..9013d73af22d 100644
> > > --- a/tools/lib/perf/include/perf/evsel.h
> > > +++ b/tools/lib/perf/include/perf/evsel.h
> > > @@ -4,6 +4,8 @@
> > >
> > > #include <stdint.h>
> > > #include <perf/core.h>
> > > +#include <stdbool.h>
> > > +#include <linux/types.h>
> > >
> > > struct perf_evsel;
> > > struct perf_event_attr;
> > > @@ -39,5 +41,7 @@ LIBPERF_API int perf_evsel__disable_cpu(struct perf_evsel *evsel, int cpu);
> > > LIBPERF_API struct perf_cpu_map *perf_evsel__cpus(struct perf_evsel *evsel);
> > > LIBPERF_API struct perf_thread_map *perf_evsel__threads(struct perf_evsel *evsel);
> > > LIBPERF_API struct perf_event_attr *perf_evsel__attr(struct perf_evsel *evsel);
> > > +LIBPERF_API void perf_counts_values__scale(struct perf_counts_values *count,
> > > + bool scale, s8 *pscaled);
> >
> > not sure if we should use __s8 for pscaled now when it's exported?
> > it's just we use it everywhere else with '__' prefix, I forgot what's
> > the difference actually ;-)
>
> I'm moving this to be __s8, following what is being used in
> tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h.
I will fix it.
> > but other that all looks good, for the patchset:
> >
> > Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Thanks for review.
Best Regards
Shunsuke
Powered by blists - more mailing lists