linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] MIPS: TXx9: Convert SPI platform data to software nodes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 29 Nov 2021 13:02:03 +0100
From:   Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        "open list:BROADCOM NVRAM DRIVER" <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] MIPS: TXx9: Convert SPI platform data to software
 nodes

On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 01:28:56PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 06:37:07PM +0100, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 04:41:00PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 01:16:22PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 11:58 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 11:23 AM Andy Shevchenko
> > > > > <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > ...
> > > 
> > > > Probably all of this can be removed, given the SPI controller driver
> > > > itself was removed in commit 74523a5dae0c96d6 ("spi: txx9: Remove
> > > > driver")?
> > > 
> > > Even better! Let Thomas speak on this.
> > 
> > let's remove it then.
> 
> Okay, who will send a patch?
> 
> P.S. I'm not a MIPS expert, I feel I'm not the right person to do,
> but I can try my best.

ok, I'll do it.

Thomas.

-- 
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea.                                                [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]